COMPARISON SCALE. Hehe, that’s because their reasoning compares a miniature model with a GIANT model (kind of scary) 😱
However, the composition of the miniature model can actually be used to reason about the larger scale. Why? ❓
Because the larger scale is essentially a collection of miniatures. So, don't get trapped by the HUGE SCALE, hehe.
They only reason on the surface level. If they delved deeper, they would generally realize (atheists, in particular) and turn around in circles.
⭕️ They go round and round, trying to pull us to the (relative) surface so that we don't pull into the profundity, which they accuse of having small-scale reasoning but (starting) they realize that their small-scale perspective is also valid for the big picture.
👉 It's possible that they are puzzled by why it "feels" reasonable. But they don't realize that it involves an absolute truth capable of projecting quantities and qualities from a small scale to a large scale accurately.
♒♒♒
Let's look at the matter clearly. Let's delve into the case further.
Projection of Small Scale
Similar to a projector that can enlarge or shrink image displays. Similar to volume control that can lower or raise the volume.
Just by listening to a sound at a low volume, we can believe that at a larger scale, the composition, resolution, and capacity remain the same, and the driving force becomes even greater.
The fallacy of generalization occurs because they are not cautious enough to project quantities and qualities accurately.
This also applies when someone understands the "fallacy of composition" in the real world, which can also happen in the world of logic.
- 👉 Likewise, understanding from the perspective of everyday reality because technology allows it, then it can also be concluded that it is possible in the world of logic.
📍This means that placing a conclusion from a real situation on a small scale into a large scale can happen in the conceptual world. Likewise, the opposite, having an example that proves placing a conclusion from a real situation on a small scale into a large scale can also happen in the world of logic.
- 👉 However, those who conclude that it is impossible to apply the small scale to the large scale are limited in their perspective, or if their perspective is broad, it is not in terms of depth but rather like seeing from a great height, they won't be able to understand the essence of truth in the dimension of particles that form the foundation of reality.
📍We just need to realize how the state on a small scale can be applied to draw conclusions on a larger scale. The fundamental thing is...
〰 The projection of quantities and qualities must be accurate.
- 👉 In fact, it affirms that not only can we draw conclusions on a larger scale from a small scale, but it also shows an increase in power that grows even larger as we scale up from small to large.
⛳ So, once again, what are the requirements for the possibility of using the small scale to draw conclusions on a larger scale while maintaining context and quantities as well as qualities accurately in the realm of logic?
It's simple, if the knowledge at the small scale affirms absoluteness, then when brought to any scale, it still affirms the conclusion as known on the small scale. Why? Because absoluteness transcends dimensions, transcends scales. It remains valid in any dimension and any scale.
- 👉 In fact, the ability to reason at the quantum level (which is going viral in the intellectual realm called quantum logic) will make it easier for us to understand the grand scale validly.
Things like this. Understanding the matter of the "fallacy of composition" like this. OFTEN UNNOTICED BY THINKERS OR PHILOSOPHERS BECAUSE THEY MIGHT ALREADY BE ENTHRALLED BY THE FORMAL, NEAT, AND CONVINCING PRESENTATION. BUT, they only understand something in a limited way.
Moreover, an article, teaching, or expression from someone does not necessarily generalize a situation. So when someone firmly believes that it's a mistake to generalize (exaggerate) a problem, they may actually be generalizing it incorrectly. "SWALLOWING? THEIR OWN SPIT, hehe"
〰〰〰
Examples of reasoning at a small scale that can be used to understand situations at a larger scale validly, while maintaining accurate projection of quantities and qualities through the foundation of absolute truth, can be understood through the concept of formulation.
CONTEXTUAL CONVERSION - Scaling
Converting their (atheists) objection to the same scale. If they play on a large scale, we reduce the scale to connect with our smaller scale. WITHOUT FALLING into the 'fallacy of Composition,' hehe.
Take a closer look at the details to align the scale of their arguments.
Atomic Thinking - Module
Or break down the scale of their arguments while maintaining their integrity, so you are not perceived as diminishing their arguments.
Once broken down, communication can begin on a balanced scale. Therefore, there is no reason for them to object, as objecting would be like objecting to themselves, hehe."
❇️ A mathematical or physical formula obtained from observations at a small scale can be used to predict events at a larger scale. Those who reject this fact are worthy of questioning their claims of being "scientific."
So, don't act all scientific and judgmental without real knowledge. It's better to ask competent individuals or learn on your own to avoid rushing into absurd judgments.
In essence, if we can’t find the absolute truth, at least we can see the possibilities accurately without rushing into conclusions.
♒♒♒
Those who reject analogy modeling as being limited to small-scale and unable to be extended to large-scale, fail to realize that science relies heavily on mathematical modeling. In essence, using small-scale modeling is essentially the same.
Regardless of the terminology, they forget that science is heavily dependent on mathematical modeling, which is a form of small-scale modeling.
So, it is not an issue if analogical modeling can be converted into mathematical modeling; their accuracy would be equivalent.
The main point is not to discredit analogical modeling as something invalid, but rather the small-scale modeling, be it analogical or mathematical, as long as its scalability is not reduced in the sense that its contextual pathway remains preserved and universal. This implies cross-scalability, making it possible to extrapolate (explain states) to the larger scale.
