Here I am asserting that we need to identify its weaknesses to be prepared.
DATA INCOMPLETENESS
Sometimes when digesting many sentences, the pieces turn out to be unclear.
🧿 A = B (Immobile is Stone)
🧿 C = A (Cat is Immobile)
👉 C = B (Cat is Stone)
〰 Whereas the immobility of the cat is due to sleeping.
🧿 A = B (Breathing - Human)
🧿 C = A (Cat - Breathing)
👉 C = B (Cat is Human)
Ultimately, it needs to be re-examined to avoid accepting things haphazardly.
Cause and Effect Reasoning
Distinguish from causal logic that can accept any information without falling into ambiguity
🧿 A = B (Immobile is Stone)
🧿 C = A (Cat is Immobile)
👉 C = B (Cat is Stone)
... becomes ...
🧿 Immobile > Stone
🧿 Immobile > Cat
👉 There is no confirmation that "Cat" > "Stone" or vice versa "Stone" > "Cat"
👉 There is no causal flow from "cat" to "stone", so it cannot be confirmed just like that.
FIRST STEP
Fundamentally, Classical logic serves as a prelude to comprehending logic in religion.
It's like, without language, we can't communicate to master all languages. Starting with the initial language makes it easier to adapt and learn other languages, thereby enabling the learning of various languages available.
Similarly, Classical logic serve as a starting menu. However, it's necessary to subsequently study other logical languages, especially those present in religion. Disregarding this is akin to not placing something in its rightful place, which means limiting oneself, thereby unknowingly restricting one's freedom except for a selfish kind of freedom that weakens. Note the difference type of freedom (as long as it frees from limitations, even if it's not in line with one's will), egoistic (freedom based on selfishness), and universal (where God is unlimited, so we also inherit the same, but more limited due to our position as a consequence).
RELIGIOUS LOGIC
Classical logic should serve as the initial step in preparation for understanding religious logic.
Religious logic transcends mathematical logic, surpasses philosophical logic, and surpasses any other form of logic.
This does not mean that there is biology in religion, calculus mathematics, or chemistry within it. It is not like that.
Rather, it is a fact that all knowledge is bound by the laws of nature.
Absolute truth constrains the space of relative truth, so by understanding religious logic, we will be taught the universal truth that underlies all probabilities (relatives) present in any field of science. This helps us diagnose the direction of these probabilities.
This is how continuous logic learning should be, one that does not stop at a particular terminal of a certain logical system.
It also helps us map reality, diagnose it more accurately to the thinnest boundaries of ambiguity, and be able to draw wisdom (draw conclusions) more accurately.
KNOWLEDGE GRAPH
The current era of reasoning employs the 'knowledge graph.'
It is a mapping of cause-and-effect relationships that form a hierarchy.
Utilizing models like this, or commonly known as mind-mapping, assists us in mapping the direction of meaning without being trapped by ambiguity.
Later, if there's time, we can dissect a sentence into several interconnected modules forming a 'knowledge graph,' enabling us to realize the extent to which an exploration can be conducted.
KNOWLEDGE GRAPH - Limit Boundary
A mapping of cause-and-effect relationships forming a hierarchy can determine the points of connection and discontinuity.
Once mapped, we can simply trace its data path and quickly identify where the bottlenecks lie and where its branches (ambiguities) are, thereby detecting its contextual direction without involving unnecessary elements (focus).
META REASONING
What distinguishes meta reasoning from what is commonly known in its various versions (LLM, Knowledge Graph, RNN, Bayesian, and others)❓
In metaphilosophy, the method of reasoning is the same, utilizing cause-and-effect relationships that form a hierarchy.
However, its network (map) is initially arranged with modules of absolute truth, so we don't create a path map from scratch, but merely place it on the pre-established path of truth. Something overlooked by many artificial intelligence systems until now. Do they not know?
