Empirical proof through logical consequence is objectively stronger than proof based on cause and effect, making the proof truly objective.
Proof based on logical consequences derived from objective experience is indirect proof, but valid as if experienced directly, making it more realistic.
How Objective?
At least more objective than more subjective.
It is indeed not fully objective, because it is merely closer to being objective.
The objectivity that can be pursued means absolutely more objective.
Absolute objectivity cannot be achieved, but absolutely more objective can be achieved.
❇️ YOU ARE NOT REALISTIC IF YOU CANNOT BE TOTALLY REALISTIC
🔰 Then how to think that is not merely realistic but fully realistic❓
❇️ Those who accuse of lack of objectivity mean that there is objectivity, while accusing of objectivity can also be subjective meaning there are those who are less subjective and those who are more objective, which means it is not possible that there is only subjectivity without some degree of subjectivity, because subjectivity itself is recognized through objective assessment.
✅ In essence, do not arbitrarily accuse of being totally subjective, even though there is a glimpse of objectivity that can become the objective foundation for truth that can affirm absolute truth.
