Why should there be something 'uncaused'? Couldn't it just be 'unbounded' that is 'infinite'?
📍 If there is something that precedes without ceasing, does the total quantity remain the same or change?
- 〰 If the total quantity remains the same, then there is something uncaused.
- 〰 If the quantity is not constant (increasing - there is something infinite), then there is a new addition (effect) in the opposite direction, which means there are two directions of effects that, when traced back, will converge at one causal point.
〰〰〰
📍If something has ever existed, then it has its predecessor.
📍If there are multiple hypotheses for the same case, and they are non-contradictory, then the strongest hypothesis is accepted, even though it may not be true
- 👉 Also if there are two certain hypotheses for the same case, and they are non-contradictory, then the consistent certainty is accepted, even though it may not be true.
〰〰〰
📍The cause always has a broader scope than its effect. If there is a preceding causality, retracing back to the previous point will always encompass the potential subsequent effects. This leads to an increase in diverse variations of effects as we move further back to the previous cause, which tends to become simpler (with less diversity).
- 👉 Therefore, if there is a specific pattern on a small scale, it certainly originates from a pattern that may or may not originate from the largest pattern, but at least it originates from a larger pattern.
