METAPhilosophy: AWARENESS, FREEDOM & CAUSE-EFFECT - Understanding Boundaries in Philosophizing
If the cause knows its effect, then it merely knows the effect without hindering it, because knowing does not imply forcing, but merely awareness.
Freedom
If the cause governs its effect, then the characteristic of the effect's power depends on the cause, so if the cause characterizes freedom, then the effect also characterizes freedom, even though its freedom is limited.
Example: a ball held by a cat exhibits either freedom or less limitation compared to a ball played by a child, which becomes even less restricted (more free) when played by an adult.
Territory - Contextual
So who acts when humans act❓Who acts when the consequences act❓Certainly, the action of consequences is powerless without the action of the cause.
The territory between cause and effect differs. If the effect is unaware of itself, then the cause acts, and if the effect is aware of itself as an effect and unaware as a cause, then any action from the effect is an action of the cause but a decision of the effect.
❇️ The Cause Grants Power Over the Effect, And Actions That Are Realized by the Effect Originate from the Effect
Therefore, the question "who does wrong when our actions cannot happen without His power"❓The answer is that we do good/bad actions, but these actions originate from His power for our freedom.
- ⭕️ If you argue that even consciousness comes from Him, which acknowledges the territory, but the condition of consciousness as an effect is certainly different, so there is a territory entitled to decide because of His power.
At this point, or with universal thinking like this, it asserts not only "our limited freedom still shows signs of limitation," but also avoids "cognitive bias" ✅ thinking we (the effect) are God (the Absolute Cause) ❌
♦️ Or if further rebuttal is needed, then ...
- ⭕️ If we consider ourselves without sin because everything comes from Him, then we turn back that the "cause" plays and acts with Himself and that our pain, our suffering is fully experienced by Him as well ❌. If so, then the absolute cause harms Himself ❌. An objection that leads to the absurdity of reasoning.
Therefore, understanding the cause-effect relationship must realize the thinly veiled boundaries to understand the hierarchy of territorial dependence that cannot be equated, because we are never equal to Him (the effect is not equal to its cause).
SO❓We are limitedly free, also having a territory of consciousness as an effect's consciousness, so our bad actions cannot be directed to their cause.
This is similar to cognitive bias (failure to perceive) when saying "God creates good/evil, so God has an evil side" ❌. At this point, they cannot overcome this if they only rely on avoiding "logical fallacy." Because logical fallacy actually justifies the evil of God based on known reasoning. But they forget that behind the cause-effect reasoning that can trap, there is our weak perception that becomes the root of the logical fallacy, which if cognitive bias is overcome, it will appear that "God being evil" is unreasonable. How can this happen❓
Problem Of Evil
Because there is only one God, we cannot compare which God is good/bad.
Meanwhile, in our dimension, there is good/bad because our condition can be compared to others.
❇️ God is not good/bad but true - The Truth (Most True)
In philosophy, we often get trapped in wordplay, tinkering with meanings until meanings overlap without realizing it, because for every reasoned element not connected to the reality of what is, it falls into cognitive bias (fails to perceive)
🔰 In essence, in philosophy, one must be able to distinguish between knowledge, experience, and many other aspects of boundaries (territory - context - domain), so as not to misposition due to incorrect observation.
