Similarity does not guarantee a cause-and-effect relationship between two things that have similarities. Therefore, it cannot be ensured that the similarity between monkeys and humans confirms the inheritance of humans from monkeys.
It cannot be determined whether humans and monkeys came from the same ancestor because more than one different ancestor can occur through differences in genetic combinations that didn't always came from inheritance.
Scientific evidence also cannot guarantee the possibility of the extinction of different human ancestors from monkey ancestors.
Evolution is true, natural selection occurs, but there is also uncertainty that humans are not necessarily from monkeys, and human ancestors are not necessarily the same as monkey ancestors. However, in general, the process of evolution through natural selection can indeed occur, but there must be limits to the scope of understanding that still maintain its certainty, making it reasonable.
〰〰〰
Something cannot exceed itself without an addition outside of itself. One cup of tea will not become one gallon of water.
Likewise... because evolution involves natural selection, and natural selection produces humans who are capable of formulating certainty and formulating certainty confirms the involvement of intelligence, while the process of evolution as a cause cannot be exceeded by its effect, then the process of evolution involves intelligence that is apparent in its effect, namely humans.
Likewise, a coincidence cannot surpass its own condition (it will always occur by chance) to become full certainty if there is no intervention outside of the coincidence that involves certainty.
Similarly, in evolution that involves coincidence, certainty will never emerge if there is no intervention of certainty in the process considered a coincidence.
Other factors of certainty that affect coincidence indicate the presence of intelligence that characterizes certainty more than the product of coincidence itself (namely humans).
Because the effect cannot exceed its cause, then the cause of coincidence cannot be the same as the effect, which is certainty, so the cause that intervenes in coincidence must be intelligence that has the potential for certainty beyond humans.
And the one who intervenes in the coincidence process must certainly surpass humans because the process that surpasses coincidence involves intervention that exceeds the potential for certainty in humans, so those who intervene in the coincidence process involve intelligence beyond human intelligence.
In conclusion...
1⃣ What needs to be avoided in understanding evolution is not to assume uncertainty in evolution.
2⃣ The exaggerated claim in evolution that needs to be avoided is the claim that humans can determine the first ancestor from millions of years ago, which could be different.
3⃣ And another exaggerated claim is that humans come from monkeys.
4⃣ Evolution through natural selection does not involve coincidence but involves certainty that confirms intelligence.
5⃣ Intelligence involved in evolution surpasses human intelligence.
6⃣ We must still understand and appreciate the uncertainty in evolution and avoid exaggerated claims.
