SO WHEN IT'S SAID SUPERPOSITION COLLAPSES CAUSALITY❓
Not exactly, in fact, it's because the 'Cause' becomes the 'Effect,' and in the same context, the 'Effect' becomes the 'Cause.' Hence, classical logic and classical philosophy still hold true, making it a contradiction❗️ Not superposition❓
Yes, there's a contradiction ✅ But is there superposition❓Yes, there is ✅
The analysis goes like this...
If cause and effect are equivalent, it becomes impossible, so the other possibility is not cause and effect but...
- 1⃣ All Causes. If causes, then there’s no interaction between them, but their effects lead outward from the causes, beyond the current focus.
- 2⃣ All Effects. If effects, there’s interaction originating from outside the event.
So, the possibility lies only in point 2.
Both A & B are entirely effects, so the superposition is between the effects themselves, meaning they don't influence each other but only have a common interaction.
The cause isn't between them; there's a third cause outside that. That's the contingency. The third cause for believers could be directed towards God, while scientifically, they might seek gravity or whatever, but it's not as simple as assuming there's no contradiction. Superposition needs to be understood from a different perspective.
Other Side
Since the potential of the cause is broader than the effect, they can’t swap places. Therefore, logically, if they exchange positions, it’s because there’s a third cause.
"SO❓IT IS NOT TRUE THAT SUPERPOSITION DESTROYS CAUSALITY. IN FACT, SUPERPOSITION AFFIRMS THAT THERE IS SOMETHING UNDERLYING CAUSALITY, NAMELY LOGICAL CONSEQUENCES."
