When we engage in daily communication, it's a form of intelligent communication that doesn't require the involvement of symbols or academic logical rules.
Similarly, when we speak, there's no need to grasp grammar rules. Everything happens automatically and mostly succeeds because of our years of memorization.
Memorization
We memorize two things: meaning and speech. Meaning is derived from our desires' movements, and speech is derived from the moment when there's a convergence between "our desires' movements" and "someone's speech" at the time of our desires' movement.
Desire + Speech
If we have the desire to eat ('me-ma-kan') and someone says, 'Let's eat,' it forms a memory of 'desire (to eat)' + 'speech (let's eat).'
So, whenever someone says 'Let's eat,' we interpret it as 'the context is a desire to eat.
SYNCHRONIZATION - Degree of Empathy
So, how can one accurately memorize the correct phrase "let's eat" when they have the desire to "consume"❓
That's because someone else has previously experienced having a "desire motion," which, from their experience, allows them to know that we have a "desire to eat," so they respond with the phrase that matches our "desire motion," which is "let's eat."
Different Sensitivities
MISUNDERSTANDING. If someone misunderstands our desire motion, they will utter inappropriate phrases, and we will memorize them as a combination of our "desire motion" + "incorrect phrases" (obtained from others).
SYNCHRONIZATION - Busyness
Misunderstandings like this often occur because between us and others, we both try to guess each other's 'desire movements' (wants), and... among us, we have different sensitivities, while such activities require quick responses in seconds, so memorizing each other's desires and words occurs without considering each other's degrees.
📍 For example, two people have the same desire to walk in the morning. I want to walk leisurely, while the other wants to walk quickly. I don't know their language, and they don't know mine. Both of us meet, expressing gestures of desire to walk, while uttering 'words' representing our desires.
- 〰 However, my words memorized previously are related to my desire to walk leisurely.
- 〰 Whereas, my friend’s utterance, which they memorized beforehand, is related to their desire to walk fast.
SYNCHRONIZATION - Overview
People eventually learned to memorize foreign words from each other, the type of desire-driven motion with different sensitivities, BUT THOUGHT TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE TRUTH, although it is true, just slightly off.
- 👉 Example: "walking slowly" = "let's take a slowly walk." "walking quickly" = "let's walk quickly."
- Both of us couldn't think about the details quickly, so the memorization was directed at the essence (context), which is "walking." So, when I say "walking" which was connected to her saying "walk quckly," it means that if she wants to "take a leisurely walk," her expression is "let's walk quickly."
It happened in everyday life, exchanging information, memorizing, with a difference in "depth (empathy)" + "rush" = providing simplifying
📌 But when we have leisure time, not in a hurry, and consider the process slowly (thinking), we realize that something is strange (ambiguous), but we are confused about where the mistake lies
FAST SYNCHRONIZATION
WHAT HAS HAPPENED❓ We've found ourselves in a subjective situation, as a result of something memorized, learned, hurriedly marked without considering the details (the depth of the process, the depth of desire, the depth of circumstances), so it tends to be superficial, only the big picture. AND INDEED, IT HAS BEEN SUCCESSFUL IN BRINGING BENEFITS, MEANINGFUL MESSAGES, AND REALITY AS WE EXPECTED. Why❓
JUST ENOUGH TACTICS. At that time, we are moving quickly and do not need perfection. As long as it works, as long as it is fulfilled.
Yes, it's subjective because it's considered less objective, inconsistent, unstable
But that's not actually what's behind subjectivity. Subjectivity is objective, which means ...
- 1⃣ Consistent on one side
- 2⃣ Less detailed on the other side
- 3⃣ Weak control over the situation
This is because of points 1 & 2, thus forming point 3
✅ Simply put, "subjective is less objective, not entirely unobjective & objective is less subjective, not entirely non-subjective"
SUCCESS SUBJECTIVELY - Personal
All forms of subjectivity are actually broadly measured as a degree of belief. THIS IS SUBJECTIVE = LESS CONVINCING
When we cannot understand the details but only the broad reality and still yield tangible results, then it can be considered a subjective matter (personal), especially if its success rate is generally low.
Subjectivity, in the end, can be accused as the root of pseudoscience. Because the knowledge or information expressed...
- 1⃣ Lacks consistency over time, having irregular fluctuations in the frequency of difficulties.
- 2⃣ Remains at a general level, lacking details, but is given a high degree of belief (concluded more broadly).
✅ In simple terms, its SUCCESS, its CONDITION is considered subjective because it is:
- 〰 LACKING DETAILS (despite being personal), DIFFICULT TO CONTROL (despite weak adaptability).
SUCCESS SUBJECTIVELY - Difficulty Level
When we are unable to comprehend the details and can only grasp the broad strokes of reality, yet yield tangible results, it can be perceived by others as a subjective matter or accused of pseudoscience when discussed in the realm of science, especially if the success rate is low.
The questions that need to be asked about subjective matters are as follows...
- 1⃣ What might have been overlooked?
- 2⃣ What is the degree of success?
- 3⃣ Is it general or specific in nature?
The issue is that the preparation can be time-consuming but should not be deemed subjective as long as the success is generally applicable and can be practically replicated.
✅ Fundamentally, points 1⃣ to 3⃣ emphasize HOW STRATEGIC THE METHOD IS & HOW TACTICAL THE RESULTS ARE IN REAL LIFE.
SUBJECTIVITY & OBJECTIVITY - Rational
So, how do we evaluate the quality of subjectivity and objectivity?
All realities operate within a layered cause-effect framework, ranging from surface-level to the deepest, converging towards an Ultimate Cause that can be comprehended through faith-based prayers.
As moving closer to the surface, where events more readily understood without the need for prayer, prayer is often labeled as a subjective tool.
In reality, the deeper we go, the more it converges, the more minimalist the structure of its dimensions becomes, the fewer interactions there are. Consequently, the cause-effect structure diminishes, except when it narrows down to a single cause. This, in essence, affirms the scientific convergence of reality dimensions into the dimension of change (the conservation of energy) or gravity.
✅ The measure of subjectivity & objectivity lies in HOW DETAILED the cause-effect relationships are, enabling practical & consistent success, which is universal (not personal)❓
MEASURING RATIONALITY - Definitions
Something is subjective because it is considered unclear, while objective tends to be clearer. Regardless of whether its dimensions are physical or metaphysical, if it is so clear, tactically successful in interacting with it, then it is objective, even if it exists in a metaphysical dimension.
LIMITS OF UNDERSTANDING. Rationality is the initial step in understanding cause-and-effect relationships that may be incorrect because they have not been measured. SO, THE QUESTION IS, HOW IS RATIONALITY MEASURED❓
Because rationality results from observing dimensions considered subjective and objective, its value is seen in how far we can measure the quality of rationality through tangible evidence.
Tangible Evidence
Empirically, tangible evidence is not just evidence through sight but evidence through observation (measurable). If it's not like that, it means a regression in recognizing threats that are not always visible (which may initially be subjective).
MEASURING RATIONALITY - Rationality & Probabilistic
Rationality is the initial step in assessing the objectivity of a situation. It still needs to be measured to go beyond narrow rationality - untested.
Holding untested rationality is like speculating, although it can be called cautious speculation. Why❓Because a dynamic reality needs to be mapped to match our rational thinking. To make its rationality measurable and show its best probability.
Mathematical Rationality
Mathematics is known as an area that is rational and considered a place of axiomatic truth - self-evident.
The combination of "rational + doesn't need proof" traps one into thinking that rationality is indisputable.
But rationality isn't evidence of certainty; it's only a matter of probability. So, does that mean mathematics is uncertain (as demonstrated by Gödel)❓No, on the contrary, mathematics is fundamentally certain. In the sense that all rationality in mathematics has been measured.
RATIONALITY, SUBJECTIVE & OBJECTIVE - Mapping
AT THE ROOT OF THE ISSUE, SUBJECTIVITY & OBJECTIVITY are measured through their roots, which are EASILY PRACTICALLY MASTERED AND ON A GENERAL SCALE.
REALITY, Inner and physical reality can be categorized as subjective and objective dimensions because their (subjective) conditions are harder to control compared to the physical dimension (objective)
KNOWLEDGE. It's subjective because it is only estimated, not measured except on a personal level. It is objective because it has been measured, albeit not absolutely and not universally (especially if it is the absolute truth itself, it is undoubtedly the pinnacle of objectivity)
APPLICATION. Subjective application, because its methods are considered unclear, its success is inconsistent, and its reach is limited, except in a very personal or limited community context.
Example: throwing an object is an objective event, but it becomes subjective when it’s claimed that ghosts can throw it (can’t be objectively tested).
Example: throwing an object is an objective event, but it becomes subjective when it's claimed that ghosts can throw it (can't be objectively tested).
TESTING RATIONALITY - Recognizing Subjectivity & Objectivity
When rationality needs to be tested, it involves measurable reality.
Measurement can be done in two ways: directly (experiencing) and indirectly.
It should be realized that the concept of measuring directly or indirectly does not imply the absence of direct or indirect interaction but rather the presence of an intermediary. The only difference is that direct measurement occurs because the gap or distance of the interaction is very short.
Even when touching an object directly, there is still a barrier between our physical selves and what is being touched, which is the empty space.
So, don't be confident that you have touched something directly and have seen something as it truly is. NO❗️ What happens is that you perform measurements (perception) and detection, which allows you to know its existence.
❇️ YOU ONLY SEE LIMITED REFLECTIONS - SHADOWS, so its state is never as it should be.
OVERCOMING SUBJECTIVITY - Rational Subjectivity
THE ROOT OF THE ISSUE. Subjectivity and objectivity are measured at their root, which is EASILY CONTROLLED IN A PRACTICAL AND GENERAL SCALE.
📍 Let's approach it this way:
REALITY, use appropriate tools. Don't measure metaphysics with physics.
KNOWLEDGE. Use valid modules of absolute truth that are universal.
APPLICATION. The method is sufficient (complete), so it can be consistently adapted widely and repeatedly and provide practical results (easy and widespread - general).
Subjectivity is not nonsense but evidence of our irrelevant approach, so it doesn't provide a complete conclusion.
❇️ If we take an objective approach, it means we must use relevant methods to approach subjective matters so that subjectivity can be measured. If the approach is irrelevant, it means you are not rational because objective actors are always on the side of the subjective, and there is always a subjective and objective aspect on both sides.
RATIONAL OBJECTIVITY - Synergy
Objective rational philosophy, where objective matters must involve relevant approaches without neglecting realistic idealism and having pragmatic value. It views subjectivity as merely a matter of not having found a relevant approach. Once a relevant approach is found, subjectivity becomes objectivity.
Philosophy in this vein involves religion as something relevant to approach higher subjective dimensions to realize the existence of new objective dimensions that encompass the previous objective dimensions.
Objective rational philosophy sees everything as something that can be measured in a relevant way, contributing to the knowledge of universal absolute truth.
RATIONAL OBJECTIVITY - Contextual
Objective rational philosophy also means seeing things objectively as they are and responding to them rationally in a contextual manner as an adaptation.
Subjectivity That Is Objective
Objective rational philosophy recognizes that subjectivity does not mean randomness, ambiguity, or lack of pattern but is based on the awareness obtained from the ability of objective rationality itself to produce knowledge of the absolute truth that "randomness cannot exceed its randomness, thus reaching a certain limit that affirms the existence of a certain pattern." Therefore, objective rational philosophy recognizes the presence of an objective aspect in subjectivity.
