1⃣🔰 For one cause to yield different effects, and many effects always arise from different causes, thus the multitude of causes is actually a consequence of a single cause.
👉 One cause yields different effects
- 〰 One thing has many functions
- 〰 One thing has many characteristics
- 〰 One thing has many attributes
- 〰 One thing has many activities
🧩 Each has various potentialities reflecting different capabilities, thus having different steps as well.
👉 Many effects always arise from different causes
- 〰 Different directions yield different results
- 〰 Different starting points yield different endings
- 〰 Different strategies yield different outcomes
- 〰 Different inputs yield different outputs
🧩 If one cause is examined, there is never the same position and condition, thus it never yields the same result, except solely due to our failure to observe details, which affirms the absence of the same effect from different causes or the same.
👉 The multitude of causes is actually a consequence of a single cause
- 〰 If one cause yields many effects, and there are many causes, then the multitude of causes is only a consequence of a single cause.
- 〰 If one thing triggers many events, and there are many triggers for many events, then those many triggers will culminate in the root event as the initial trigger.
- 〰 If many events are triggered by many causes, and there is only one trigger, then the many causes originate from a single trigger, thus the multitude of causes stems from a single cause.
- 〰 If there are many causes with one single cause, it means that the multitude of causes is only a relative cause of the absolute cause, which means that the multitude of causes is only a consequence of a single cause.
🧩 If the multitude of causes stems from a single cause, it means that the multitude of causes is only a consequence of a single cause.
CONCLUSION
❇️ One cause leads to effects that serve as causes for other effects.
📍Many different causes can never produce a single effect because different causes provide different perspectives on the resulting effects.
- 〰 Different frequencies yield different sound qualities.
- 〰 Different forces result in different speeds.
- 〰 Different equations produce different graph shapes.
- 〰 Different data yield different statistical values.
🧩 Different inputs result in different outputs.
CONCLUSION
❇️ Causes are broader than effects, so if the number of causes is the same as the number of effects or fewer, it means that all these causes must originate from a single cause, so that all effects are always smaller than their causes.
📍That if an effect occurs not due to a single cause, then the multiple causes have fewer reasons up to the initial limit of a single cause.
- 〰 If all effects originate from multiple causes, then as it approaches a single cause, the number of non-single causes will decrease.
- 〰 If there is only one trigger for all events, then tracing all events will reduce the number of events when approaching the initial trigger.
- 〰 If a space with many flat surfaces gives different directions of reflection, then the number of reflection directions always comes from the number of flat surfaces that end in a space encompassing many flat surfaces.
- 〰 Regardless of the number of effects, if they originate from a single cause, the number of effects will decrease as it approaches the single cause.
🧩 The more effects originate from a single cause, the fewer the number of effects when approaching that single cause.
CONCLUSION
❇️ If there are many effects stemming from one or more causes, the number of involved causes decreases when approaching a single effect or primary trigger.
1⃣ If there is no single cause, then all effects only stem from preceding effects that have never been a cause at all, meaning that every effect that exists is actually not caused by any cause whatsoever, which implies that for each separate event...
👉 If there is no single cause, then all effects only stem from preceding effects that have never been a cause at all.
- 〰 An effect arises from a cause that is an effect of a previous cause.
- 〰 If there is no convergence at a single cause, then every sequence of effects will not meet at one point.
- 〰 If the paths of effects do not converge at one point, then each path of effects ends at its own single cause or as an effect alone.
👉 If every existing effect is actually not caused by any cause whatsoever, then...
- 〰 Every cause is an effect, so every sequence of effects is separate from each other.
- 〰 If there are paths that never meet, it means their paths are always separate.
🧩 If there is no convergence, then they are separate.
CONCLUSION
❇️ In this context, the conclusion is that if there is no single cause, then all effects are separate and cannot be traced back to a single cause.
2⃣ If separate locations imply something that separates them, then there is something that separates between them, creating their separation.
- 〰 If they are separate, it means there is something between them.
- 〰 If there is nothing separating them, it means there is no separation.
🧩 If there is nothing in between, then there is no separation.
CONCLUSION
❇️ If there is a distance between two entities, there is empty space separating them.
3⃣ If the fact that separate locations have logical consequences of something separating them, then what separates includes what is separated, or if it does not include, it means what separates is also separate from what it separates.
- 〰 If what separates is space, then what separates includes what is separated.
🧩 What separates can be an object or empty space.
CONCLUSION
❇️ What separates can be an entity between two entities or encompasses both entities separated by that emptiness.
REFLECTING ON THE ABSOLUTENESS OF CAUSE AND EFFECT
1⃣ If what separates also separates from what is separated, then there is something that separates between the two that separates from each other, which means this logical consequence affirms the simultaneity of increasing quantities that affirm an unlimited quantity for each that separates and that which is separated.
- 〰 If separated means not merging
- 〰 There is a distance between objects, hence a separation between objects
- 〰 There is a distance between objects, implying something separates between objects, so distance is not an impossibility in separation, affirming the existence
- 〰 Recognizing the presence of a distance between objects means recognizing the non-impossibility that affirms something separates.
🧩 Something separating from what is separated also does not merge, always leaving a separating distance, so what separates is distinct from what is separated.
CONCLUSION
❇️ There is no definite number for objects that separate and objects that are separated because they continually remain separate from each other without limits.
2⃣ If there is more than one limitlessness, then each limitlessness is in the same extent, so each of them is essentially one part of the total unity of what was previously considered as separate and mutually separating, which actually emphasizes the inseparable part.
- 〰 The limitlessness implies no bounds or comprehensiveness - completeness
- 〰 Two limitlessnesses encompass everything without exception.
🧩 The same extent and the most extensive, thus occupying the same space.
CONCLUSION
❇️ Two limitlessnesses are just one limitlessness.
3⃣ If unity is concluded from the logical consequence of the boundlessness of what separates and what is separated, then it's not actually separation but rather diversity in an undivided unity that becomes two, allowing unity to manifest an indivisibility within the singularity.
- 〰 If the consequence of boundlessness negates separation, then separation is merely distinct parts within an undivided singularity.
- 〰 Separation is diversity within an inseparable unity.
