Often we hear, the strongest evidence is 'seeing is believing'. The strongest evidence must come through perception. We need to clarify this issue clearly.
📌 Link
🎖489 🧩 Truth that is considered to be self-evident does not require proof, it's because its boundaries are fully recognized, making its simplicity not a matter of being unnecessary to prove, but rather because it is easily understood, thus appearing to be self-evident.
📌 Link
🎖490 🧩 The objective is not something that can be directly proven, but rather something that can be understood through its cause and effect, or can be realized through its logical consequences.
📌 Link
🎖491 🧩 Cause and effect affirm a relative sequence of possibilities, so knowledge based on cause and effect is not fundamental knowledge, because what is relative requires a fundamental space of change.
📌 Link
🎖492 🧩 Logical consequences do not affirm the sequence of events of cause and effect, but affirm continuity as the basis for the movement of the possibilities of cause and effect, so knowledge based on logical consequences is more fundamental than knowledge derived from observing cause and effect.
📌 Link
🎖493 🧩 Knowledge based on cause and effect can be sensory, while knowledge from logical consequences may not always be sensory, but knowledge from logical consequences is more fundamental than knowledge of cause and effect, thus proving knowledge does not always have to be sensory but can be realized through the recognition of its absolute universal truth, ensuring its truthfulness.
📌 Link
🎖494 🧩 Although knowledge from logical consequences is more fundamental than knowledge of cause and effect, and does not require sensory proof, it still requires evidence from a relevant smaller scale.
📌 Link
🎖495 🧩 A smaller scale can be used as an argument without reducing objectivity, because in reality, objectivity always consists of smaller objectivities, and the connection between different scales is applied objectively ifi the context is maintained.
🧿 We can see how smaller elements unite to form a broader objective picture.
✅ It emphasizes that evidence through inference is not the strongest form of evidence, but it also doesn't mean that evidence without inference can easily compete with evidence through inference, unless the evidence is a knowledge that holds universality (universal truth).
