Axioms must be inferred from axioms. so it needs initial axioms first
Testing axioms must involve empirical proof. So it's a hoax that says "the axiom of truth without proof"
It's just that proving the axioms requires a reasoning model that is 360° different from the current one. Why?
Because experts everywhere agree that it's hard to prove axioms. Can't prove it, he said. The reason?
Some truths are particular ("some") and some are universal ("everything is confirmed"). The problem is how to test the truth claims of universal axioms if not all areas can be explored by us empirically?
That's why axioms are often associated with mathematics because their certainty is observable without the need to investigate the entire universe. Namely through geometric dimensions
This is where things that are non-geometric (physics - nature) are considered as mere postulates because they are difficult to say for sure
FAIRY TALE ABOUT TRUTH WITHOUT THE NEED FOR PROOF
SO THE STORY, TALE, OR FAIRY TALE ABOUT "THERE IS TRUTH THAT DOESN'T NEED TO BE PROVEN" ❓❌❌❌ Why❓
- If it cannot be proven, then is it certain? ❓❌
- If it cannot be proven, then is it possible? ❓❌
- If it cannot be proven, then is there a basis in reality? ❓❌
At least there is direct evidence ✅ or if there is no direct evidence, at least there is indirect evidence with the possibility of examples ✅
〰〰〰
